User talk:DMacks

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Thomas College[edit]

I'm confused by the deletion rationale at File:Thomas College drone 2023.jpg. What artwork does it incorporate? Thanks. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:32, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Similar question for File:Official Thomas College logo 2023.png. I would think that particular logo comes under the heading of too-simple-to-copyright anyway, right? --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:34, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The school's social-media and website contain several videos, from this appears to be a frame extract. Looking back at the logo, I agree it is below TOO. Do you think it should be left as self/CC0, or retagged as PD-text? DMacks (talk) 17:08, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm leaning toward PD-text. And if you check the file metadata for the drone shot, it's consistent with a still image taken from a done, as specified. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 14:52, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I don't doubt that it is "a drone shot". But from dealing with this uploader, they do not seem to recognize that they might not have authority to license-release on behalf of their employer. I did not know that detail fully at the time I originally tagged it. But given their subsequent silence regarding employer-permission, it could just as well go down as no-permission/go-to-VRT. DMacks (talk) 04:03, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour[edit]

What I would amour right now is some fried chicken.-Homme affamé (talk) 02:14, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DMacks. It looks like there is an inconsistency between the file name and chemical structure in this image you recently uploaded (carboxylic acid vs amide). Can you have a look? Regards, Marbletan (talk) 12:26, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ooooops, fixed. Thanks for catching that! DMacks (talk) 13:57, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eflapegrastim[edit]

I noticed that you uploaded a chemical structure image for eflapegrastim. However, I don't think it's correct. Eflapegrastim seems to be a complex protein, not a small molecule as depicted in your image. The Drugbank database, for example, describes eflapegrastim as "a form of recombinant human G-CSF comprising a human G-CSF analog coupled to the Fc fragment of human IgG4 via a polyethylene glycol linker" (https://go.drugbank.com/drugs/DB15001). Innerstream (talk) 21:26, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Innerstream: That's from the SMILES on Wikidata (and same as InChI key) for eflapegrastim (Q30314101) (see also (2S)-1-[3-[2-[3-[[(1S,2R)-1-carboxy-2-hydroxypropyl]amino]propoxy]ethoxy]propyl]pyrrolidine-2-carboxylic acid (Q76801920)), which has the correct CASNo. But looking at the drug refs, this is clearly wrong. SciFinder has no structure for the name, and no entry for that structure I drew. Easy enough for me to nuke the image. What is to be done with wikidata? DMacks (talk) 01:45, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. It looks like incorrect data got attached to the Wikidata item for eflapegrastim. I don't edit there much, but it seems like the best thing to do is to simply remove conflicting data from the entry, so I have done so. Innerstream (talk) 12:42, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]