User talk:Stemoc/2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Thanks![edit]

Thanks for uploading the latest images I'd asked for from the iDominick Flickr account - saved me some work. :) Tabercil (talk) 14:40, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

sure, i was wondering how you missed those images..so he releases them when requested?..good to know :) ..--Stemoc 22:24, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Well I noticed his heads-up to me on the license change, but wasn't able to immediately upload them which was how you had the opportunity to do that. And I'm still working through his Flickr account to see what else we can make use of - right now I'm waiting for changes in the Big Bang set which'll end up replacing the infoboxes for all the lead actors on the show. If you're going to ask him for shots, all I'd like is to be given a heads-up beforehand so we don't end up working to cross-purposes. Tabercil (talk) 15:24, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
no problems, I prefer not to ask people to release their images unless there is a major need (a major actor/recent death). I won't be requesting him for any images as i find him adding images from 2013 and 2014 periodically a bit weird..--Stemoc 01:08, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

How[edit]

So I ask Sean Koo to change the licenses on some pictures, and if I'm not quick enough, you upload them lol How do you do that? How do you know that they've changed licenses? Lady Lotus (talk) 12:05, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't..I asked him to change licence for all, he said he may..so waiting on that for now :) --Stemoc 12:38, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well that was just last night, but you've done it in the past too. Like the one of Lori Laughlin he wanted me to upload but you did it before I could and I was like...how'd he know he changed the license?? You're just that good ;) Lady Lotus (talk) 19:24, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Whenever I come across a flickr user that uploads pics of celebs, I stalk them lol. Image reviewers also have access to a feature/extension called Upload Wizard/Flickr which makes uploading free images from Flickr faster which will soon be available to all...I'm a big Lori fan, when i saw her image was free, I jumped..lol I hope he changes the licence to free for all celebs in that album, he has some good images and the photographs are really good too (no low-res Instagram types)--Stemoc 00:20, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I hope he does too, a lot of good shots :) Lady Lotus (talk) 12:45, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're like a ninja! I asked JD with Mingle Media to change the licenses on 12 images, he told me last night that he did and then you uploaded them before I could again! LOL how do you know or find out that an image changes it license for use on here? I wanna know how to do that lol Lady Lotus (talk) 12:31, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, I don't, i'm on flickr and i follow a lot of flickr accounts, when MM updates, i check to see if any image has been licensed freely, most times its not..I had to check twice to see if those images were on commons, and then i uploaded them..haha ..sorry :P ..--Stemoc 13:43, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Lol no worries! How do you check to see if any image has been licensed freely? Is there a button for that? lol Such a flickr noob ;) Lady Lotus (talk) 17:17, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well i'm a licence reviewer which gives me access to a tool which can upload all the free images from any set (50) so i make good use of that, there is also a tool called Flickr2commons which has a similar capability though it won't always tell you if that image is already on commons ..btw, create an account on flickr, follow users that have uploaded free images to flickr and follow them, if they add more, you'll know, its just a matter of checking on the images :) --Stemoc 01:32, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Lea T 2014.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

INeverCry 05:06, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@INeverCry: , yeah that user actually had a lot of images on cc-by-sa and I uploaded a few of them, but when i thanked him for allowing use of his image, he deleted that image changed all the licenses to ARR..as per our policy, flickr licenses are "irrevocable" so i let them be..I have no reason to manipulate licences ..--Stemoc 05:22, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The problem here is that the image shows you as both uploader and reviewer, which makes your review invalid per policy. INeverCry 05:25, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
sure, u can re-review and delete it, I was told by someone a few weeks after i added it that it was not the same Lea T ..apparently..--Stemoc 05:32, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
File:Cara Delevingne September 2014.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 20:13, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Shattered Banksy (12025816145).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

The Haz talk 09:55, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Owls are not What They Seem (12130594676).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

The Haz talk 09:55, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Who (12130205613).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

The Haz talk 09:56, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edgar Lungu[edit]

Hi Stemoc. Thank you for uploads. I came across this higher resolution image: [1] from the US Embassy's Flickr account. Ali Fazal (talk) 12:21, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

haha, excellent, I searched for hours on all social media and flickr, couldn't find it, they probably uploaded in a day ago.. i lso got the month wrong..grr..thanks, uploaded and cropped :) --Stemoc 12:47, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, BaseSat (talk) 20:01, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:David Carter 2014.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ballofstring (talk) 03:07, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jerry Mateparae and Speaker David Carter 2014.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ballofstring (talk) 03:08, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Too artificial-looking[edit]

Hello there! I saw that you tried to improve Sophie Hunter's image. But to be quite honest, it really looks unnatural, like it has been under a lot of alterations, and it must have. This is a version of the image http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/2/2c/20150202043020%21Sophie_Hunter.jpg uploaded by INeverCry on 03:56, 2 February 2015 looks just like the original photo. I think it would be best to just use this version, if it's too small, you can just resize it. Just my opinion. 180.191.69.3 13:38, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Sophie Hunter and Benedict Cumberbatch 2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

1989 16:04, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thompson image[edit]

As discussed, do not rewrite an image by a cropped version please. Besides, your crop is of more poor quality than the original (no offense but you simply cut too much). There are currently three versions of the file: